, and 
between 666/1024 and 822/1024Please refer to RP-230736 for detailed scope of the SI.
R1-2304176 Session notes for 9.15 (Study on Self-Evaluation towards the 3GPP submission of a IMT-2020 Satellite Radio Interface Technology) Ad-Hoc Chair (Huawei)
R1-2302871 SI work plan for Study on self-evaluation towards the IMT-2020 submission of the 3GPP Satellite Radio Interface Technology Ericsson
R1-2302693 Considerations on evaluation methodology for IMT2020 Satellite RIT CATT,CAICT
R1-2302774 Discussion on self-evaluation methodology for IMT-2020 satellite radio interface OPPO
R1-2303157 On evaluation methodology for IMT-2020 Satellite Samsung
R1-2303346 Evaluation methodology for IMT-2020 satellite MediaTek Inc.
R1-2303619 eMBB Spectral Efficiency SLS parameters and assumptions Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2303626 Discussion on simulation assumptions for self-evaluation of IMT-2020 satellite radio interface technology Panasonic
[112bis-e-R18-Sat_Eval-01] – Alberto (Qualcomm)
Email discussion on evaluation methodology by April 26th
- To be kicked off after the first online session
- Check points: April 21, April 26
From April 17th GTW session
R1-2304008 Feature lead summary #1 on evaluation methodology for IMT-2020 Satellite Moderator (Qualcomm)
Decision: The document is noted.
R1-2302873 Assumptions for the Self-Evaluation for the Satellite Component of IMT-2020 Ericsson, Qualcomm, Thales
Provides basic simulation assumptions to be used for the self-evaluation of peak data rate and peak spectral efficiency.
Decision: The document is noted.
R1-2302384 Evaluation methodology of IMT-2020 satellite Huawei, HiSilicon
· Proposal 1: Satellite self-evaluation focuses on transparent payload only. If RAN can check and confirm regenerative payload be supported by Rel-17 specifications, then the evaluation results for transparent payload can be used as a reference for regenerative payload for ITU submission.
· Proposal 2: The channel model in section 6 of TR 38.811 can be viewed as an adaptation for satellite evaluation on top of terrestrial evaluation and can be used for satellite self-evaluation.
· Proposal 3: Reuse the wrap around mechanism in section 6.1.1.1 of TR 38.821 for satellite self-evaluation.
· Proposal 4: The additional parameters listed in Table 3 are added on top of example parameters in section 8.2.3 of Report ITU-R M.2514 for Rural-eMBB-s evaluation.
· Proposal 5: Companies are encouraged to provide calibration curves aligned with TR 38.821 calibration case 9 or case 10 when providing satellite self-evaluation results. Then there is no need for additional cross-company calibration.
· Proposal 6: Both non-full buffer simulation and full-buffer simulation defined in section 7.1.3 of Report ITU-R M.2412 are used for satellite connection density evaluation, with the following adaptation to satellite self-evaluation:
o Traffic model for QoS calculation is defined in Table 1 in section 8.2.3 of Report ITU-R M.2514.
o Requirement for evaluation is defined in section 7.2.8 of Report ITU-R M.2514.
· Proposal 7: The calculation method of pre-processing SINR from TR 37.910 is reused for system-level simulation followed by link-level simulation.
· Proposal 8: Additional parameters listed in Table 5 are added on top of example parameters in section 8.2.3 of Report ITU-R M.2514 for Rural-mMTC-s evaluation.
· Proposal 9: The evaluation methodology defined in section 7.1.4 of Report ITU-R M.2412 is reused to evaluate mobility, with the same evaluation parameters and configurations selected for the evaluation of average spectral efficiency, and with speed of 250 km/h.
· Proposal 10: The additional parameters listed in Table 3 are added on top of example parameters in section 8.2.3 of Report ITU-R M.2514 for Rural-HRC-s evaluation, as that for Rural-eMBB-s.
· Proposal 11: For peak spectral efficiency assessment, the generic formula defined in TR 37.910 can be reused, and the highest coding rate, maximum modulation order and maximum number of layers need to take into consideration of the achievable values based on, e.g., link budget analysis of CNR.
· Proposal 12: The effect of earth curvature on area calculation needs to be considered for evaluating area traffic capacity.
· Proposal 13: Control plane latency, user plane latency and mobility interruption time should be discussed by RAN2.
· Proposal 14: Energy efficiency should be discussed by RAN2.
Decision: The document is noted.
R1-2302435 Discussion on self-evaluation methodology for potential 3GPP submission of IMT-2020 Satellite Radio Interface Technology Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell
· Proposal 1: The evaluation of the peak spectral efficiency considers a UE at nadir and in LOS conditions without presence of interference for the relevant satellite deployment cases.
· Proposal 2: The evaluation of the peak data rate considers a UE at nadir and in LOS conditions for the relevant satellite deployment cases.
· Proposal 3: The evaluation of the control and user plane latencies should focus on LEO scenarios.
· Proposal 4: The evaluation of the mobility interruption time should be based on cells from the same gNB or co-located gNBs and LEO scenario assumptions.
· Proposal 5: Evaluation assumptions should include the realistic UE handset antenna gain of -5.5 dB
· Proposal 6: The scenarios are limited to transparent architecture without ISL.
· Proposal 7: RAN1 to decide that the eMBB-s simulations focus on LEO600, Set-1 and handheld UEs.
· Proposal 8: Connection density for eMTC should focus on the maximum density, limited by the RACH capacity.
· Proposal 9: The evaluation should focus on handheld UEs with the assumptions from 38.821 Table 6.1.1.1-3.
· Proposal 10: Under the evaluation it may be considered to assume a UE with full availability of UE capabilities such as e.g. support of 32 HARQ processes.
· Proposal 11: RAN1 to discuss whether 100% LOS can be considered or whether a model like in [5] should be included in the evaluation.
Decision: The document is noted.
R1-2303299 Discussion on the evaluation methodology of Self-Evaluation towards the 3GPP submission of a IMT-2020 Satellite ZTE
· Proposal 1: The test environment is Rural for all usage scenarios, and channel model for Rural in sector 6.6.6 and 6.6.7.2 in [3] can be used.
· Proposal 2: Evaluation for handheld terminals and S-band should be considered as the baseline.
· Proposal 3: The assumption listed in Table 1-4 should be considered as the baseline of parameters for self-evaluation.
· Proposal 4: For peak data rate and peak spectral efficiency evaluation, VSAT and Ka-band with up to 400 MHz should be considered. For other characteristics, handheld and S-band with up to 30 MHz should be considered.
Decision: The document is noted.
R1-2304009 Feature lead summary #2 on evaluation methodology for IMT-2020 Satellite Moderator (Qualcomm)
R1-2304118 Feature lead summary #3 on evaluation methodology for IMT-2020 Satellite Moderator (Qualcomm)
Decision: Asper email decision posted on April 24th,
Agreement
The proposals and proposed working assumption in Section 2 of R1-2304118 are endorsed.
Decision: Asper email decision posted on April 25th,
Agreement
Signals from one satellite to a UE would be seen as site-specific according to Table 7.6.3.4-1 of TR 38.901.
R1-2304123 Feature lead summary #4 on evaluation methodology for IMT-2020 Satellite Moderator (Qualcomm)
Decision: Asper email decision posted on April 27th,
Agreement
The proposal in Section 2 of R1-2304123 is agreed.
Placeholder only. No contributions in RAN1#112bis-e.
Placeholder only. No contributions in RAN1#112bis-e.
Please refer to RP-230736 for detailed scope of the SI.
R1-2306146 Session notes for 9.14 (Study on Self-Evaluation towards the 3GPP submission of a IMT-2020 Satellite Radio Interface Technology) Ad-Hoc Chair (Huawei)
[113-R18-Sat_Eval] – Alberto (Qualcomm)
Email discussion on self-evaluation towards the 3GPP submission of a IMT-2020 satellite radio interface technology
- To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc
R1-2304436 Further discussion on self-evaluation methodology for 3GPP submission of IMT-2020 Satellite Radio Interface Technology Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell
R1-2304628 Evaluation methodology of IMT-2020 satellite Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2304755 Evaluation methodology and performance consideration for IMT2020 Satellite RIT CATT
R1-2304759 Consideration on IMT-2020 Satellite self-evaluation THALES
R1-2305365 Further discussion on self-evaluation assumptions Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2305448 Discussion on self-evaluation methodology for IMT-2020 satellite radio interface OPPO
R1-2305560 Discussion on the Self-Evaluation for IMT-2020 Satellite ZTE
R1-2305700 Discussion on evaluation assumptions for self-evaluation of IMT-2020 satellite radio interface technology Panasonic
R1-2305703 Peak data rate and peak spectral efficiency evaluation Ericsson
R1-2306083 Feature lead summary #1 on evaluation methodology for IMT-2020 Satellite Moderator (Qualcomm)
From Friday session
Agreement
The proposals and conclusions in Section 1 of R1-2306083 are endorsed, except for proposal 2.4 (which is already included in the proposed conclusion).
Placeholder only. No contributions in RAN1#113.
Placeholder only. No contributions in RAN1#113.
Please refer to RP-231296 for detailed scope of the SI.
R1-2308550 Session notes for 9.14 (Study on Self-Evaluation towards the 3GPP submission of a IMT-2020 Satellite Radio Interface Technology) Ad-Hoc Chair (Huawei)
Endorsed and contents incorporated below.
[114-R18-Sat_Eval] – Alberto (Qualcomm)
Email discussion on self-evaluation towards the 3GPP submission of a IMT-2020 satellite radio interface technology
- To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc
R1-2306507 Evaluation methodology of IMT-2020 satellite Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2306567 Discussion on the evaluation methodology of the self-evaluation ZTE
R1-2307247 Remaining discussion on evaluation methodology for IMT-2020 Satellite submission Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell
R1-2307551 Discussion on self-evaluation methodology for IMT-2020 satellite radio interface OPPO
R1-2307706 Discussion on remaining issues for evaluation methodology Samsung
R1-2307729 Consideration on IMT-2020 Satellite self-evaluation THALES
R1-2307955 Further discussion on self-evaluation assumptions Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2308233 Feature lead summary on Evaluation Methodology for IMT-2020 satellite Moderator (Qualcomm Incorporated)
From Friday session
Agreement
For DL and UL overhead:
Agreement
For the evaluation metrics that require usage of beam area, a beam area of 1415 km2 is assumed.
Agreement
The modeling of delay / RTT for SLS is up to companies to report.
Agreement
All the beams are considered for computing the area of connection density.
Agreement
For SLS to LLS metric of connection density, “pre-processing SINR” should be used instead of “pre-processing SNR”.
Agreement
Elevation angle of 90° is used for determining mean and standard deviation values of K-factor and delay spread for NTN TDL-C Rural channel model.
Agreement
For mMTC LLS (NR and eMTC), 16-QAM can be used in addition to QPSK to derive the SNR to SE mapping.
Agreement
For connection density evaluation with full buffer system-level simulation followed by link-level simulation, for SINR CDF distribution derivation, all the beams are assumed to be fully loaded.
Observation:
Based on RAN1 evaluations, for peak data rate and spectral efficiency the max code rate and modulation order is:
·
For DL, the modulation
scheme is , and between 666/1024 and 822/1024
·
For UL, the modulation
scheme is 
, and 
between 434/1024 and 553/1024
Agreement
3GPP will report peak data rate and spectral efficiency based on
822/1024 and for DL553/1024 for and for UL
Agreement
For the link budget template:
· The attached xls to R1-2308233 is endorsed as the starting point for the link budget template.
· The target elevation angle is [30] degrees, and the link budget template includes the link margin (in dB) at that elevation angle.
· The LLS to derive the “required SNR” for the link budget template is performed under an NTN TDL-C rural channel model with the K-factor corresponding to the target elevation angle.
· The rest of the parameters (bits / #reps / others) and whether different values are used for different scenarios (eMBB-s, HRC-s, mMTC-s) are to be discussed via email discussion.
[Post-114-ITU-Sat-01] Email discussion on link budget template from August 28 until September 6 – Alberto (Qualcomm)
R1-2306407 Simulation results for the study on self-evaluation towards the IMT-2020 of the 3GPP Satellite RIT THALES
R1-2306508 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2306568 Discussion on the Self-evaluation results for NR NTN ZTE
R1-2307067 Initial evaluation result for NR NTN CATT
R1-2307248 Initial evaluation results related to IMT-2020 Satellite for NR over NTN Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell
R1-2307362 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN xiaomi
R1-2307407 Initial evaluation results on NR-NTN for self-evaluation of IMT-2020 satellite radio interface technology Panasonic
R1-2307496 Calibration results and peak data rate analysis for NR NTN NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2307552 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN OPPO
R1-2307707 Discussion on evaluation results for NR NTN Samsung
R1-2307774 Satellite IMT-2020 self-evaluation: Peak data rate and spectral efficiency Ericsson
R1-2307956 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2306416 Feature Lead Summary #3 on self-evaluation results for NR NTN THALES
From Friday session
Agreement
The results of CL, Geometry SIR and Geometry SINR simulated on DL are to be reported within the attached template.
Attachment: R1-2306416_Calibration_results v00
Agreement
The attached template is used to collect evaluation results for eMBBs peak spectral efficiency and peak data rate.
Attachment: R1-2306416 - Att eMBBs_ Peak spectral efficiency_Peak data rate v01
Agreement
Downlink peak spectral efficiency is evaluated based on analytical method. The evaluation result is provided in the following Table.
The detailed assumptions will be captured in the TR 37.911.
NR NTN DL peak spectral efficiency (bit/s/Hz)
|
SCS [kHz] |
30 MHz |
Req. |
|
|
FR1 |
15 |
[3.71] |
3 |
Based on the above, NR NTN fulfils DL peak spectral efficiency requirement.
Agreement
Uplink peak spectral efficiency is evaluated based on analytical method. The evaluation result is provided in the following Table.
The detailed assumptions will be captured in the TR 37.911.
NR NTN UL peak spectral efficiency (bit/s/Hz)
|
SCS [kHz] |
1.44 MHz |
Req. |
|
|
FR1 |
15 |
[1.85] |
1.5 |
Based on the above, NR NTN fulfils UL peak spectral efficiency requirement
Agreement
DL peak data rate for NR NTN is evaluated based on the evaluation results of NR NTN peak spectral efficiency. Using the analytical way as provided in Report ITU-R M.2514.
The evaluation result is provided in the following Table.
It is observed that NR fulfils the DL peak data rate requirement.
NR NTN DL peak data rate (Mbit/s)
|
SCS [kHz] |
30 MHz |
Req. |
|
|
FR1 |
15 |
[111] |
70 |
Agreement
UL peak data rate for NR NTN is evaluated based on the evaluation results of NR NTN peak spectral efficiency. Using the analytical way as provided in Report ITU-R M.2514.
The evaluation result is provided in the following Table.
It is observed that NR fulfils the UL peak data rate requirement.
NR NTN UL peak data rate (Mbit/s)
|
SCS [kHz] |
1.44 MHz |
Req. |
|
|
FR1 |
15 |
[2.76] |
2 |
Agreement
The attached text proposal for TR 37.911 is endorsed from RAN1 perspective. Note: the detailed structure of the TR is up to the TR editor.
Attachment: TP to TR37.911-Peak spectral efficiency and peak data rate-v02
Agreement
The attached template is used to collect evaluation results for eMBBs 5th percentile user spectral efficiency, average spectral efficiency, user experienced data rate and area traffic capacity.
Note: OH as agreed in 9.14.1 will be removed from the template.
Attachment: R1-2306416 - Att eMBBs_Spectral Efficiency_User data rate_Area traffic capacity_v01
Agreement
The attached template is used to collect evaluation results for the TPR on mobility.
Attachment: R1-2306416 Att eMBB-s_Mobility _v00
Agreement
The attached template is used to collect evaluation results for the TPR on reliability.
Attachment: R1-2306416 Att_ HRC-s-Reliability_v00
Agreement
The attached template is used to collect evaluation results for the TPR on connection density.
Attachment: R1-2306416 Att_ConnectionDensity -v002
Agreement
RAN1 to provide at RAN1#114-bis evaluation results on Energy efficiency, including both network and device.
Agreement
For NR NTN Connection Density LLS:
· Agree 10% BLER as target for throughput for Full Buffer
· SINR - user spectral efficiency (SE) mapping graph for Full Buffer, where:
o SE = nominal SE × (1-BLER)
R1-2306509 Self-evaluation results for IoT NTN Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2306569 Discussion on the Self-evaluation results for IoT NTN ZTE
R1-2307553 Self-evaluation results for IoT NTN OPPO
R1-2307708 Discussion on evaluation results for IoT NTN Samsung
R1-2307957 Self-evaluation results for IOT NTN Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2308033 Self-evaluation results for IoT NTN MediaTek Inc.
R1-2308410 Feature Lead summary for 9.14.3: Self-Evaluation Results for IoT NTN Moderator (MediaTek)
From Friday session
Conclusion
No discussion needed regarding whether E-UTRA operating bands 255 and 256 can be used for Rel-17 IoT NTN, as it is already clear that this point does not affect the submission.
Agreement
For IoT NTN Connection Density LLS:
· Agree 10% BLER as target for throughput for NB-IoT Full Buffer and eMTC Full Buffer
· Companies to use QPSK-π/4 as well as BPSK-π/2 in evaluations for NB-IoT Full Buffer.
· Each company to provide SINR - user spectral efficiency (SE) mapping graph for NB-IoT Full Buffer and eMTC Full Buffer, where:
o SE = nominal SE × (1-BLER)
Please refer to RP-231296 for detailed scope of the SI.
R1-2310547 Session notes for 8.15 (Study on Self-Evaluation towards the 3GPP submission of a IMT-2020 Satellite Radio Interface Technology) Ad-Hoc Chair (Huawei)
Friday decision: The session notes are endorsed and contents reflected below.
[114bis-R18-Sat_Eval] – Alberto (Qualcomm)
Email discussion on self-evaluation towards the 3GPP submission of a IMT-2020 satellite radio interface technology
- To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc
R1-2310358 Evaluation methodology of IMT-2020 satellite Huawei, HiSilicon (rev of R1-2308902)
R1-2309153 Discussion on the evaluation methodology of the self-evaluation ZTE
R1-2309399 Discussion on remaining issues for evaluation methodology Samsung
R1-2309607 Discussion on self-evaluation methodology for IMT-2020 satellite radio interface OPPO
R1-2309984 Evaluation assumptions for HRC-s for IoT NTN MediaTek Inc.
R1-2310165 Further discussion on self-evaluation assumptions Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2310471 Feature lead summary on Evaluation Methodology for IMT-2020 satellite Moderator (Qualcomm Incorporated)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
Proposal 1.1 in section 6 of R1-2310471 is endorsed with TBS value 1736 for NR NTN Rural eMBB-s table.
Agreement
For the link budget template, the target elevation angle is 30 degrees, and the link budget template includes the link margin (in dB) at that elevation angle.
Agreement
Include the receiver interference in the link budget template for NTN, and reuse the following average INR results from TR 38.821:
· 4.4 dB for FRF3 DL,
· 7.6 dB for FRF3 UL
Agreement
The UE speed is updated as 3 km/h in the template for results collection for connection density.
Agreement
The maximum delay for reliability should be reported with at least consideration on the impact of assumed layout, number of repetitions, usage of HARQ, and feeder link delay.
R1-2310587 Feature lead summary#2 on Evaluation Methodology for IMT-2020 satellite Moderator (Qualcomm Incorporated)
From Friday session
Conclusion
Not include IoT NTN reliability evaluation for HRC-s in TR 37.911.
Conclusion
Not include IoT NTN energy efficiency results to TR 37.911.
Agreement
At least for eMBB-s spectral efficiency evaluation, a value of 0dB for scintillation loss can be optionally used (in addition to the already agreed 2.2dB) and results can be separately captured in TR 37.911.
R1-2308868 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN THALES
R1-2308903 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2309095 Discussions on self evaluation results for NR NTN vivo
R1-2309154 Discussion on the Self-evaluation results for NR NTN ZTE
R1-2309292 Initial results on NR-NTN self evaluation towards IMT 2020 submission CEWiT
R1-2309400 Discussion on evaluation results for NR NTN Samsung
R1-2310558 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN xiaomi (rev of R1-2309439)
R1-2310497 Further evaluation for NR NTN CATT (rev of R1-2309509)
R1-2309608 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN OPPO
R1-2309713 Evaluation results on NR-NTN for self-evaluation of IMT-2020 satellite radio interface technology Panasonic
R1-2309738 Evaluation results related to IMT-2020 Satellite for NR over NTN for Earth Fixed Cell Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell
R1-2309944 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN CCU, ITRI
R1-2310054 Calibration results and peak data rate analysis for NR NTN NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2310391 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN Qualcomm Incorporated (rev of R1-2310166)
R1-2310189 Study on Self-Evaluation of Satellite RIT – Energy Efficiency Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI
R1-2310220 Satellite IMT-2020 self-evaluation results for NR NTN Ericsson
R1-2308869 Feature Lead Summary#1 on self-evaluation results for NR NTN THALES
R1-2308870 Feature Lead Summary#2 on self-evaluation results for NR NTN THALES
From Wednesday session
Observation:
The results of CL, Geometry SIR and Geometry SINR simulated on DL and UL transmissions reported within the attached template are aligned with TR 38.821 calibration case 9 and case 10.
Attachment: R1-2308869 1 Att Calibration_results v06
Agreement
The results of CL, Geometry SIR and Geometry SINR simulated on DL and UL transmissions reported within the attached template will be captured in the TR 37.911.
Attachment: R1-2308869 1 Att Calibration_results v06
Agreement
Confirm the values of NR NTN peak spectral efficiency and Peak data rate reported in the pCR in RP-231946 for TR 37.911 with the following correction:
· Peak data rate (Mbit/s) in uplink should be 2.67 instead of 2.76
Agreement
Capture the following observation and table in the TR 37.911:
It is observed that NR NTN fulfils the mobility requirement under 250 km/h.
Table Evaluation results of NR NTN mobility under 250 km/h
|
Frequency reuse factor |
ITU Requirement |
|
Number of samples |
|
|
FRF1 |
Normalized traffic channel link data rate (bit/s/Hz) |
0.005 |
[0.07] |
[4] |
|
Residual decoded packet error ratio |
1% |
[0.16%] |
[3] |
|
|
FRF3 |
Normalized traffic channel link data rate (bit/s/Hz) |
0.005 |
[0.14] |
[4] |
|
Residual decoded packet error ratio |
1% |
[0.34%] |
[3] |
|
Agreement
Capture the following observation and table in the TR 37.911:
It is observed that NR NTN fulfils the reliability requirement for downlink.
Table 1 Evaluation results of DL reliability for NR NTN
|
Frequency reuse factor |
ITU Requirement |
DL Reliability |
Number of samples |
|
FRF 1 |
99.9% |
[99.98%] |
[4] |
|
FRF 3 |
99.9% |
[99.96%] |
[5] |
Agreement
Capture the following observation and table in the TR 37.911:
It is observed that NR NTN fulfils the reliability requirement for uplink.
Table Evaluation results of UL reliability for NR NTN
|
Frequency reuse factor |
ITU Requirement |
UL Reliability |
Number of samples |
|
FRF 1 |
99.9% |
[99.97%] |
[4] |
|
FRF 3 |
99.9% |
[99.97%] |
[5] |
Agreement
Capture the following observation and table in the TR 37.911:
It is observed that NR NTN fulfils connection density requirement.
Table Evaluation results of connection density for NR NTN
|
Traffic model |
Frequency reuse factor |
ITU Requirement |
Connection density(/km2) |
Bandwidth (kHz) |
Number of samples |
|
1 message/day/device |
FRF1 |
500 |
[7334] |
180 |
[4] |
|
FRF3 |
500 |
[28115] |
540 |
[4] |
|
|
1 message/2 hours/device |
FRF1 |
500 |
[611] |
180 |
[4] |
|
FRF3 |
500 |
[2340] |
540 |
[4] |
Agreement
The same energy efficiency aspects from the terrestrial self-evaluation in the report TR 37.910 apply for NTN as well on network side and device side. Thereby the text on the energy efficiency requirement from TR 37.910 can be reused for TR 37.911 with changes as necessary, considering only 15 kHz subcarrier spacing.
Final summary in R1-2308871 Feature Lead Summary#3 on self-evaluation results for NR NTN THALES
R1-2308904 Self-evaluation results for IoT NTN Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2309155 Discussion on the Self-evaluation results for IoT NTN ZTE
R1-2309609 Self-evaluation results for IoT NTN OPPO
R1-2310321 Evaluation results for IoT NTN MediaTek Inc. (rev of R1-2309985)
R1-2310392 Self-evaluation results for IOT NTN Qualcomm Incorporated (rev of R1-2310167)
R1-2310500 Feature Lead summary for 8.15.3: Self-Evaluation Results for IoT NTN Moderator (MediaTek)
Agreement
For eMTC evaluations, companies to report the TBS size used.
Please refer to RP-231296 for detailed scope of the SI.
R1-2312511 Session notes for 8.15 (Study on Self-Evaluation towards the 3GPP submission of a IMT-2020 Satellite Radio Interface Technology) Ad-Hoc Chair (Huawei)
Friday decision: The session notes are endorsed and contents reflected below.
[115-R18-Sat_Eval] – Alberto (Qualcomm)
Email discussion on self-evaluation towards the 3GPP submission of a IMT-2020 satellite radio interface technology
- To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc
R1-2312444 Text Proposal to TR 37.911 for Connection Density evaluation for IoT NTN and NR NTN MediaTek, Thales, Qualcomm (rev of R1-2312001)
Agreement
The TP to TR 37.911 for Connection Density evaluation in R1-2312444 is endorsed.
---------------------------------
From AI 5
R1-2310784 LS to RAN1 on RAN2 progress of NTN Self Evaluation RAN2, Ericsson
Decision: To be handled in agenda item 8.15. To be moderated by Asbjorn (Ericsson).
R1-2312175 [Draft] Reply LS on RAN2 progress of NTN Self Evaluation Ericsson
No identified issues related to the assumptions or the final evaluation values provided in RAN2 TP. No need to send a reply.
R1-2311204 Discussion on the evaluation methodology of the self-evaluation ZTE
R1-2311257 Discussion on self-evaluation methodology for IMT-2020 satellite radio interface OPPO
R1-2312058 Further discussion on self-evaluation assumptions Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2312139 On evaluation criteria for adopting the evaluation results for TR 37.911 Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell
R1-2312149 Evaluation methodology of IMT-2020 satellite Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2312355 Feature lead summary on Evaluation Methodology for IMT-2020 satellite Moderator (Qualcomm Incorporated)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
For the number of retransmissions in HRC-s:
· The SNR value (required SNR) will be obtained by averaging the submitted SNR values to R1#115.
· The transmission bit rate and spectral efficiency will be calculated assuming 4 transmissions (4kbps, 0.022 bps/Hz)
Agreement
The link budget template in R1-2312355 (v3) is endorsed, subject to further check during R1#115.
· The link budget template includes only the average SNR for each channel and scenario (and not the individual SNR values reported by companies)
R1-2310856 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2310940 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN THALES
R1-2311116 Discussions on self-evaluation results for NR NTN vivo
R1-2311205 Discussion on the Self-evaluation results for NR NTN ZTE
R1-2311258 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN OPPO
R1-2311562 Evaluation results of NR-NTN for IMT-2020 satellite radio interface technology Panasonic
R1-2311566 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software
R1-2312322 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN NTT DOCOMO, INC. (rev of R1-2311641)
R1-2311750 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN CCU, ITRI
R1-2312265 Self-evaluation results for NR NTN Qualcomm Incorporated (rev of R1-2312059)
R1-2312140 Comparison results related to IMT-2020 Satellite for NR over NTN for Earth Fixed Cell Vs. Earth Moving Cell Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell
R1-2312162 Satellite IMT-2020 self-evaluation results for NR NTN Ericsson
R1-2312447 Further evaluation results for NR NTN CATT
R1-2310941 Feature Lead Summary#1 on self-evaluation results for NR NTN Moderator (THALES)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
The updated results of CL, Geometry SIR and Geometry SINR simulated on DL and UL transmissions reported within the attached template will be captured in the TR 37.911 as in Attachment B.1_ Calibration.
Agreement
Confirm the values of the evaluation results of NR satellite access mobility under 250 km/h agreed in RAN1#114bis with the following modification.
Table Evaluation results of NR satellite access mobility under 250 km/h
|
Frequency reuse factor |
ITU Requirement |
Value |
Number of samples |
|
|
FRF1 |
Normalized traffic channel link data rate (bit/s/Hz) |
0.005 |
0.07 |
4 |
|
Residual decoded packet error ratio |
1% |
|
4 |
|
|
FRF3 |
Normalized traffic channel link data rate (bit/s/Hz) |
0.005 |
0.14 |
4 |
|
Residual decoded packet error ratio |
1% |
0.33% |
4 |
|
Agreement
Adopt the TP for clause 4.9 of TR 37.911 on Mobility evaluation in NR satellite access provided within the attached document (Attachment: Att TP for TR37.911- Mobility) with the addition of “Value” at the top of the third column of the table.
Agreement
Confirm the following evaluation results of DL and UL reliability for NR satellite access:
Table 1: Evaluation results of DL reliability for NR satellite access
|
Frequency Reuse Factor |
ITU Requirement |
DL Reliability |
Number of samples |
|
FRF 1 |
99.9% |
99.98% |
4 |
|
FRF 3 |
99.9% |
99.96% |
5 |
Table 2: Evaluation results of UL reliability for NR satellite access
|
Frequency Reuse Factor |
ITU Requirement |
UL Reliability |
Number of samples |
|
FRF 1 |
99.9% |
99.97% |
4 |
|
FRF 3 |
99.9% |
99.97% |
5 |
Agreement
Adopt the TP for clause 6.1 of TR 37.911 on Reliability evaluation in NR satellite access provided within the attached document (Attachment: Att TP for TR37.911- Reliability).
Agreement
The evaluation results of connection density for NR satellite access are updated as follow:
Table Evaluation results of connection density for NR satellite access
|
Traffic model |
Frequency reuse factor |
ITU Requirement |
Connection density(/km2) |
Bandwidth (kHz) |
Number of samples |
|
1 message/day/device |
FRF1 |
500 |
7205 |
180 |
4 |
|
FRF3 |
500 |
27357 |
540 |
4 |
|
|
1 message/2 hours/device |
FRF1 |
500 |
600 |
180 |
4 |
|
FRF3 |
500 |
2277
|
540 |
4 |
Agreement
Adopt the TP for clause 4.8 of TR 37.911 on Energy efficiency evaluation in NR satellite access provided within the attached document (Attachment: Att TP for TR37.911- Energy efficiency).
R1-2310942 Feature Lead Summary#2 on self-evaluation results for NR NTN Moderator (THALES)
From Friday session
Agreement
The proposals in section 12 of R1-2310942 are agreed.
R1-2311206 Discussion on the Self-evaluation results for IoT NTN ZTE
R1-2311259 Self-evaluation results for IoT NTN OPPO
R1-2312002 Evaluation results for IoT NTN Connection Density MediaTek Inc.
R1-2312060 Self-evaluation results for IOT NTN Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2312150 Self-evaluation results for IoT NTN Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2312419 Feature Lead summary for 8.15.3: Self-Evaluation Results for IoT NTN Moderator (MediaTek)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
Unbounded BLER results: Do not capture the values not bounded by 10% BLER in the results spreadsheet. But add a note to the Results Spreadsheet that one company showed that with unbounded BLER for FRF=1, higher connection density values are feasible due to higher spectral efficiency vs SINR.
Agreement
99%ile packet latency values: Capture in the TR that for the given connection density values the 99th percentile packet latency fulfils the <10 seconds requirement by a large margin.
Agreement
Bandwidth capture: Capture the bandwidth needed by the average result. Also add a note to say that number of users will scale up further with higher bandwidth. Capture also for NR.
Agreement
Agree the following terminology: “IoT NTN, i.e. NB-IoT and eMTC satellite access”.
Agreement
The IoT NTN _ConnDensity_Simulation Results in attachment of R1-2312419 are endorsed.